The Great DNA WAR Part 1—Gene Drive

“As in the days of Noah”

---

The Great DNA WAR Part 1—“As in the days of Noah”

We don’t name wars until after the fact. World War I wasn’t called World War I until after World War II was finished. So, it’s yet to be seen what this global war will be called, but I’m suggesting “The great DNA war against Humanity.”  I hope I live to see if the name sticks.  We have come to a crossroads in the timeline of our existence, and it is not exaggeration to say that what we do right now will determine whether we humans continue to exist as a species.

In upcoming articles, I will discuss the nature of our enemy, the details of the battlefield, and more. But first we must understand the endgame. As David Icke has said over the years, if you know the destination you can understand the path. 

Unquestionably we are engaged in a multi-dimension uncharacteristic war being fought primarily in the information space. Confusion is a huge advantage to our enemy. They have us running around worrying about food shortages, faked and manmade diseases such as Monkeypox and Marburg, and have us fighting school boards over whether or not we should continue the crap science of masking our children in schools.  All this takes much of our time and attention, thereby distracting us from recognizing their big target, which is the extermination of the human race as we know it. I say, “as we know it”, because humans will be left alive, but genetically altered.

You may have seen the excerpt from the X-Files that is floating around the Internet. In the episode referenced, agent Scully played by Gillian Anderson, runs in and warns of an impending depopulation plan brought about by genetic editing using CRISPR Cas9 technology in a “Vaccine”. 

Hollywood does seem to predict our future by about a decade.

 So, what is CRISPR Cas9 and what does it mean for us?

Suppose you wanted to create a tastier GMO celery. If you insert the gene for “tastiness” into one parent plant, then crossbreed that plant with wild type celery, 50% of the offspring will have the new gene. Then in the next generation 25% will have the new gene, and the generation after that only 12.5%, and on and on, until the gene is usually diluted out in a big population of wild celery. 

Enter CRISPR CAS9 Technology.  (CRISPR, by the way, has nothing to do with the crunchiness of food but is geneticists’ acronym for “Clustered Regular Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat” referring to a type of genetic sequence.) With this technology, they create “gene drive” to push a gene into the population rapidly and permanently. Instead of the parent plant giving the new gene to 50% of its offspring , now 100% of its offspring get the new abnormal artificial gene. And 100% of the offspring’s offspring get the gene, and on and on.   

Photo from: https://wyss.harvard.edu/media-post/crispr-cas9-gene-drives/

As this diagram shows, a rapidly reproducing species will become totally gene altered within a few years. Because of the long lifespan and reproductive length of humans, it would take longer for us, but total genetic incorporation is still estimated to occur within ten to twelve generations, or 200-300 years. 

So, if these genetic agents called COVID-19 vaccines, are as we suspect, inserting a novel genetic sequence into humans—or many novel sequences, then in 200 to 300 years, all of us will have that new gene sequence or sequences, and the human race as we know it will cease to exist. We will be some other genetic thing which may look like us and talk like us, or not. But it will not be us. 

Potentially, we could save our species Homo Sapiens from becoming something like Homo Siliconis, or Homo Borgensis, by having a breeding program.  The joke about “Pure Blood” dating services is looking less like a joke.  But here’s the final horrific problem.  If even one genetically altered humanoid (what they call the “Gene Drive Individual”), enters that pure blood gene pool, he will start the transformation chain of events for all of those who thought their children would be “Pure bloods”. 

Which brings us to the Biblical accounts.  As a child, I always hated having to read aloud from the Old Testament when we got to those boring passages about who begat who begat who…  But now I get it.  Before DNA testing, Noah had “provenance” or proof of heritage.  He was not a saint according to the stories, but he was unpolluted by the Nephilim genome. Interestingly, Noah was 10 generations from Adam. Sounds rather familiar.

And perhaps this is related to God commanding the Amalekites be wiped off the face of the earth.  No child, no sheep or goat was to be spared.  Why would God do that?  Could that have been the only way to prevent the genetic extinction of humanity?  (Exodus 17:8-13; 1 Samuel 15:2; Deuteronomy 25:17.)

Scientists justify their Gene Drive research, of course, as the answer to stopping the spread of malaria, or Dengue Fever (diseases that, by the way, are being cured by missionaries around the world using chlorine dioxide).  But, when Biology journals publish surveys of these scientists,  asking about the morality of such research, it suggests even they have concerns.

In 2010 another bit of “predictive programming” came out with the movie, “Splice”,

which depicted horrors of interspecies gene splicing.  Commensurate with the information war, this was followed by puff science articles downplaying any worries the movie might engender.  Benjamin Radford at the time was the “Bad Science columnist” for Live Science. He covered “pseudo-science psychology, urban legends, and the science behind unexplained or mysterious phenomenon.”  He explained the movie thus:  “While cinematic scientists such as those in "Splice" unwittingly unleash horrific monsters, real genetic scientists strive to help create hardier and healthier plant and animal hybrids. Drs. Frankenstein and Moreau need not apply.” (Emphasis mine)  Yeah right.  They are too busy working for us making genetic bioweapons.